Log In
Register
Home
1:22 pm
May 26, 2009
Offline
Right?
1:25 pm
Groomzilla
November 2, 2009
Offline
Perfect… where do I order?
1:40 pm
Why not try Brastop.com? Huge selection of A – J cups at the lowest prices…it'll only be staying on for a minute anyway?
2:45 pm
May 26, 2009
Offline
I love you Hanbra. For, um, research purposes could you provide any more images of the sorts of products you sell?
3:48 pm
The Groominator
November 12, 2009
Offline
I'm having this under my dress, just different stockings:
4:02 pm
May 26, 2009
Offline
This is fast becoming my favourite thread of all time.
4:08 pm
The Groominator
November 12, 2009
Offline
How about though if your woman looks like this…….
4:21 pm
May 26, 2009
Offline
OMG! That's totally sexist and sizeist, that larger lady is every bit as beautiful, strong, proud and wonderful as any other woman on this planet.
12:33 am
Groomzilla
November 18, 2009
Offline
As a bride to be, this is a tricky badger. The dress I've chosen is quite slim fitting and made of silk, so either I wear some saucy scrap of lace that will bulge under my dress and make me look like my bubbas and butt are made of porridge, or I go for Bridget Jones style pants that will suck me in and give me a killer figure during the day but will probably scar my darling betrothed for life and result in the kind of wedding night that ends up as a double page expose in New! magazine.
THe sucky-in underwear also leaves marks like whipping welts for at least three days after removal so it's not like a quick "slip into something more comfortable" moment will work either.
So – would you prefer your wife looked great in the dress but not so good in the undies, or have some tasty undercrackers with a less-than-perfect dress sillhouette?
Decisions, decisions.
1:04 am
Groomzilla
November 18, 2009
Offline
PS no offence to Messenger but her boobs look a bit ovoid in those pics.
I prefer this sort of boob arrangement:
10:18 am
May 26, 2009
Offline
jemski said:
As a bride to be, this is a tricky badger. The dress I've chosen is quite slim fitting and made of silk, so either I wear some saucy scrap of lace that will bulge under my dress and make me look like my bubbas and butt are made of porridge, or I go for Bridget Jones style pants that will suck me in and give me a killer figure during the day but will probably scar my darling betrothed for life and result in the kind of wedding night that ends up as a double page expose in New! magazine.
THe sucky-in underwear also leaves marks like whipping welts for at least three days after removal so it's not like a quick "slip into something more comfortable" moment will work either.
So – would you prefer your wife looked great in the dress but not so good in the undies, or have some tasty undercrackers with a less-than-perfect dress sillhouette?
Decisions, decisions.
I suppose the real nut of this decision is whether you'd rather your guests at the wedding would see you looking perfect, or your bloke on the wedding night.
My feeling (being a shallow sort of chap) is to impress the guests and then think of *other* ways to take your new husband's mind off a few marks.
Either that or find a magical middle way: underwear made of marshmallows?
12:56 pm
Groomzilla
November 2, 2009
Offline
I wonder if the best solution is…
Finding a sucky in underwear solution that might not look brilliant but also isn't quite as sucky in as the stuff that jemski mentions as leaving loads of marks (if indeed such an item exists). Thus looking slim and beautiful in the all important pics.
THEN
Sidling off late in the evening (once photographer has left – who can afford one past the meal anyway, right?) to change into fabulous Myla/Agent Provocateur scraps of lace and chiffon. Everyone's happy.
1:01 pm
May 26, 2009
Offline
Jeebus, I don't think men really understand the complex science behind women's undercrackers. With blokes it's boxers or briefs. Of course, he'll know what he's wearing on his wedding day: his lucky ones.
If you want to have an enlightening conversation with your other half, ask him to tell you about his lucky pants. He'll have a pair. Trust us.
2:29 pm
Groomzilla
November 2, 2009
Offline
There will be no 'lucky pants' at any stage of my wedding day… absolutely NOT. I have seen the 'lucky pants' and anything with that many holes will not be a feature of the big day…
2:59 pm
May 26, 2009
Offline
angelesque said:There will be no 'lucky pants' at any stage of my wedding day… absolutely NOT. I have seen the 'lucky pants' and anything with that many holes will not be a feature of the big day…
But the holes are how the luck gets in!
And FYI I would like a prize for restraint for not making any of the thousand jokes that I instantly thought of when you said "anything with that many holes will not be a feature of the big day…"
3:02 pm
Groomzilla
November 2, 2009
Offline
Andrew Shanahan said:
But the holes are how the luck gets in!
And FYI I would like a prize for restraint for not making any of the thousand jokes that I instantly thought of when you said "anything with that many holes will not be a feature of the big day…"
Impressed with your restraint but not with your choice of smiley… utter filth!
Right, adding 'nice new pants for groom' to wedding budget…
Most Users Ever Online: 91
Currently Online:
7 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
Craig Morris: 468
John Thorp: 181
admin: 173
Pete Boyland: 135
Dan Anderson: 58
johnethorp: 54
Rob Kedge: 47
TudorVII: 46
funkyhen: 34
Tim Evans: 32
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 49
Members: 5308
Moderators: 0
Admins: 3
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 12
Topics: 811
Posts: 3575
Newest Members: jameswt86, jimholland, horsedrawn, neilvanstone, londonphantoms, pistachiokid
Moderators:
Administrators: Andrew Shanahan (699), Bernice de Braal (34), Stag Test Dummy (117)
